Join our network. Make change happen.

GBPN connects like-minded people around the world to research, educate and implement change. Join us today.

CLOSE

Reports

3 result(s) found

Scoping review to understand the potential for public health impacts of transitioning to lower carbon emission technologies and policies

Text
English
Authors:
Rachel Tham, Geoff Morgan, Shyamali Dharmage, Guy Marks, Christine Cowie

Background: The transformation of the global energy sector from fossil-based fuels to low/non-carbon fuels will reduce environmental pollutant load, which in turn will benefit human health. However, with upscaling of emerging renewable technologies and energy sources, it is important to identify the potential for unintended health impacts, and to understand where the knowledge gaps lie with respect to health. We aimed to identify these gaps by conducting a scoping review. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of Medline, Web of Science, PubMed and EMBASE.

Drivers for green building: A review of empirical studies

Text
English
Authors:
Amos Darko,
Chenzhuo Zhang,
Albert P.C. Chan

This paper presents a comprehensive literature review of what drives the adoption of green building (GB) practices among construction stakeholders. The review is based on literature that have been published in peer-reviewed journals. Through a systematic review of the literature, authors are able to identify generic drivers for stakeholders to pursue GB. A total of 64 drivers were identified from reviewing 42 selected empirical studies. The paper presents a classification framework for the GB drivers.

Review of 10 years research on building energy performance gap: Life-cycle and stakeholder perspectives

Text
English
Authors:
Patrick X.W. Zou,
Xiaoxiao Xu,
Jay Sanjayan,
Jiayuan Wang

The reliability, security, and sustainability of energy generation and supply are of global importance and the building sector accounts for up to 32% of total energy consumption, which makes it a key player in the domain. Previous research has identified that the actual energy consumption in buildings could be as much as 2.5 times of the predicted or simulated.

Search

CLOSE