本报告通过对中国、欧盟国家、印度和美国在建筑能源规范、建筑能源标识以及金融工具方面进行系统回顾，提出并总结了这四个地区的经验和最佳实践以供各方参考学习。

本报告通过对中国、欧盟国家、印度和美国在建筑能源规范、建筑能源标识以及金融工具方面进行系统回顾，提出并总结了这四个地区的经验和最佳实践以供各方参考学习。

Highlight

A systematic review of building energy codes, energy labels and financial instruments in China, the EU, India and the USA, offering an insight into shared experiences and best practices in those regions. 

Extended Summary

A systematic review of building energy codes, energy labels and financial instruments in China, the EU, India and the USA, offering an insight into shared experiences and best practices in those regions. 

本报告通过对中国、欧盟国家、印度和美国在建筑能源规范、建筑能源标识以及金融工具方面进行系统回顾，提出并总结了这四个地区的经验和最佳实践以供各方参考学习。

请在LBNL网站下载技术报告。

第一份用英文详尽阐述的关于中国建筑节能政策研究的国际报告。

第一份用英文详尽阐述的关于中国建筑节能政策研究的国际报告。

第一份用英文详尽阐述的关于中国建筑节能政策研究的国际报告。

The first report issued internationally that provides a comprehensive English summary of Chinese studies on building energy efficiency policies in China.

This report is available in both English and Mandarin.

为比较建筑节能规范的最佳实践方法开发了第一套客观的衡量准则。

Energy use in buildings is responsible for more than 30% of global CO2 emissions and has a significant role to play in climate change mitigation, given  the large  potential  savings in  both new and existing  buildings.

为比较建筑节能规范的最佳实践方法开发了第一套客观的衡量准则。

为比较建筑节能规范的最佳实践方法开发了第一套客观的衡量准则。

A new Policy Paper released today by GBPN and the Institute for Market Transformation (IMT), the GBPN US Hub, highlights the importance to link energy codes and benchmarking and disclosure policies if we want to reduce building energy consumption.

The new Policy Paper released today captures the main findings of the dialogue initiated by the GBPN with practitioners and international code experts on the design and implementation of best practice building codes.

The International Partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation (IPEEC), in partnership with the Global Building Performance Network (GBPN) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), recently completed a new report on key areas for international collaboration on building energy code implementation.

Around the world, engineers, architects and policymakers have been exploring ways to deliver highly efficient buildings whose reduced energy demand is satisfied by clean, renewable energy. Building off of the broader concept of a green or sustainable building, the concept of the “net zero building” focuses on the energy dynamics and performance of the building. And as policymakers and leaders align toward the net zero concept, the focus on achieving deep energy efficiency has centered on integrated technologies as well as ways to connect buildings to the natural environment.

Improving residential energy efficiency is widely recognised as one of the best strategies for reducing energy demand, combating climate change, and increasing security of energy supply. However, progress has been slow to date due to a number of market and behavioural barriers that have not been adequately addressed by energy efficiency policies and programmes. This study is based on updated findings of the European Futures for Energy Efficiency Project that responds to the EU Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2014–2015 theme ‘Secure, clean and efficient energy’.

The building sector is not on track to lower total greenhouse gas emissions. Given that emissions from the sector represent nearly 40% of global energy-and process-related emissions, this represents a serious challenge to keeping global warming to 1.5oC. The Buildings sector must therefore decarbonize.To support this goal, this report focuses on policy drivers for decarbonisation, and the costs and benefits associated with their implementation.

A JRC workshop on split incentives organised in the framework of article 19(1)(a) of the Energy Efficiency Directive (Directive) has been organised in order to examine current solutions addressing split incentives in the building sector in Europe and beyond. The workshop focused on the social housing, private residential and commercial sectors. Practices from Italy, the Netherlands, the UK, Denmark, Sweden and the US were presented and a panel discussion between representatives from groups of landlords, tenants, social housing and ESCOs was held.