建筑能效:最佳实践政策和“一揽子”政策
本报告通过对中国、欧盟国家、印度和美国在建筑能源规范、建筑能源标识以及金融工具方面进行系统回顾,提出并总结了这四个地区的经验和最佳实践以供各方参考学习。
25 result(s) found
本报告通过对中国、欧盟国家、印度和美国在建筑能源规范、建筑能源标识以及金融工具方面进行系统回顾,提出并总结了这四个地区的经验和最佳实践以供各方参考学习。
本报告通过对中国、欧盟国家、印度和美国在建筑能源规范、建筑能源标识以及金融工具方面进行系统回顾,提出并总结了这四个地区的经验和最佳实践以供各方参考学习。
Highlight
A systematic review of building energy codes, energy labels and financial instruments in China, the EU, India and the USA, offering an insight into shared experiences and best practices in those regions.
Extended Summary
A systematic review of building energy codes, energy labels and financial instruments in China, the EU, India and the USA, offering an insight into shared experiences and best practices in those regions.
本报告通过对中国、欧盟国家、印度和美国在建筑能源规范、建筑能源标识以及金融工具方面进行系统回顾,提出并总结了这四个地区的经验和最佳实践以供各方参考学习。
请在LBNL网站下载技术报告。
第一份用英文详尽阐述的关于中国建筑节能政策研究的国际报告。
第一份用英文详尽阐述的关于中国建筑节能政策研究的国际报告。
第一份用英文详尽阐述的关于中国建筑节能政策研究的国际报告。
The first report issued internationally that provides a comprehensive English summary of Chinese studies on building energy efficiency policies in China.
This report is available in both English and Mandarin.
为比较建筑节能规范的最佳实践方法开发了第一套客观的衡量准则。
Energy use in buildings is responsible for more than 30% of global CO2 emissions and has a significant role to play in climate change mitigation, given the large potential savings in both new and existing buildings.
为比较建筑节能规范的最佳实践方法开发了第一套客观的衡量准则。
为比较建筑节能规范的最佳实践方法开发了第一套客观的衡量准则。
A new Policy Paper released today by GBPN and the Institute for Market Transformation (IMT), the GBPN US Hub, highlights the importance to link energy codes and benchmarking and disclosure policies if we want to reduce building energy consumption.
The new Policy Paper released today captures the main findings of the dialogue initiated by the GBPN with practitioners and international code experts on the design and implementation of best practice building codes.
The International Partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation (IPEEC), in partnership with the Global Building Performance Network (GBPN) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), recently completed a new report on key areas for international collaboration on building energy code implementation.
It is now established that energy use in buildings is a significant source of global greenhouse gas emissions and that abatement by the building sector can provide significant social, economic and environmental benefits. This paper examines the application of socio-technical transition theory to the building sector with Australian energy policy as a case study. The relatively high level of local building construction offers significant opportunities for market transition with appropriate policy settings so this national case has international implications.
Building energy efficiency is an important strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions globally. In fact, 55 countries have included building energy efficiency in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. This research uses building energy code implementation in six cities across different continents as case studies to assess what it may take for countries to implement the ambitions of their energy efficiency goals.
This paper introduces the major state-level regulations and policies for improving energy efficiency in buildings. The purpose of the review is to discuss the challenges and issues in policy implementation and the latest trend in adopting innovative instruments. The implementation of customer efficiency programs increasingly incorporates non-price instruments to encourage participation and deep savings. States pay attention to not only code adoption and update but also compliance and evaluation.
This rapid review identified two results extracted from the eight studies (published between 2013 and 2018) that fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Firstly, our analysis identified five common themes across the included studies which provide tentative information for what would be needed to make low carbon residential retrofit/renovation policy work. Secondly, we make an overall observation that the included studies did not provide sufficient evidence or establish conclusive results about the effectiveness of specific low carbon policies compared to other policies.