建筑能效:最佳实践政策和“一揽子”政策
本报告通过对中国、欧盟国家、印度和美国在建筑能源规范、建筑能源标识以及金融工具方面进行系统回顾,提出并总结了这四个地区的经验和最佳实践以供各方参考学习。
21 result(s) found
本报告通过对中国、欧盟国家、印度和美国在建筑能源规范、建筑能源标识以及金融工具方面进行系统回顾,提出并总结了这四个地区的经验和最佳实践以供各方参考学习。
本报告通过对中国、欧盟国家、印度和美国在建筑能源规范、建筑能源标识以及金融工具方面进行系统回顾,提出并总结了这四个地区的经验和最佳实践以供各方参考学习。
Highlight
A systematic review of building energy codes, energy labels and financial instruments in China, the EU, India and the USA, offering an insight into shared experiences and best practices in those regions.
Extended Summary
A systematic review of building energy codes, energy labels and financial instruments in China, the EU, India and the USA, offering an insight into shared experiences and best practices in those regions.
本报告通过对中国、欧盟国家、印度和美国在建筑能源规范、建筑能源标识以及金融工具方面进行系统回顾,提出并总结了这四个地区的经验和最佳实践以供各方参考学习。
请在LBNL网站下载技术报告。
第一份用英文详尽阐述的关于中国建筑节能政策研究的国际报告。
第一份用英文详尽阐述的关于中国建筑节能政策研究的国际报告。
第一份用英文详尽阐述的关于中国建筑节能政策研究的国际报告。
The first report issued internationally that provides a comprehensive English summary of Chinese studies on building energy efficiency policies in China.
This report is available in both English and Mandarin.
为比较建筑节能规范的最佳实践方法开发了第一套客观的衡量准则。
Energy use in buildings is responsible for more than 30% of global CO2 emissions and has a significant role to play in climate change mitigation, given the large potential savings in both new and existing buildings.
为比较建筑节能规范的最佳实践方法开发了第一套客观的衡量准则。
为比较建筑节能规范的最佳实践方法开发了第一套客观的衡量准则。
A new Policy Paper released today by GBPN and the Institute for Market Transformation (IMT), the GBPN US Hub, highlights the importance to link energy codes and benchmarking and disclosure policies if we want to reduce building energy consumption.
The new Policy Paper released today captures the main findings of the dialogue initiated by the GBPN with practitioners and international code experts on the design and implementation of best practice building codes.
The International Partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation (IPEEC), in partnership with the Global Building Performance Network (GBPN) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), recently completed a new report on key areas for international collaboration on building energy code implementation.
Building energy efficiency is an important strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions globally. In fact, 55 countries have included building energy efficiency in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. This research uses building energy code implementation in six cities across different continents as case studies to assess what it may take for countries to implement the ambitions of their energy efficiency goals.
There are indications that energy-retrofitted buildings can create risks for indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and therefore for health and comfort of occupants. A review was conducted to identify and verify those risks, within three themes: building envelope, heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC)-systems, and occupants. Publications from the last five years in major peer-reviewed journals from different fields (energy, buildings, indoor air, social sciences) were found by using a variety of keywords (health effects, occupant behaviours, energy-efficient retrofitting, etc.).
It is clear that city must be part of the solution if an urbanizing world is to grapple successfully with ecological challenges such as energy depletion and climate change. A system dynamics model was developed in this study using STELLA platform to model the energy consumption and CO2 emission trends for the City of Beijing over 2005–2030. Results show that the total energy demand in Beijing is predicted to reach 114.30 million tonnes coal equivalent (Mtce) by 2030, while that value in 2005 is 55.99 Mtce, which is 1.04 times higher than the level in 2005.
This report presents the results of a state-by-state analysis of the potential energy and cost savings from improving compliance with building energy codes to 100 percent from current levels. The report also examines 45 statewide compliance evaluation studies, providing a summary of evaluation methods and key findings. Evidence in most states indicates that staggering rates of non-compliance, as high as 100 percent in some jurisdictions, have eroded the gains from energy code development and adoption.